The Supreme Court Justice Chris Kourakis, South Australia, gave a woman to die through the suspension of health care. For the Australian court's refusal of care is not comparable to suicide. It 's the first time court decides that a State's immunity for doctors refrain from treating a patient who freely chooses to die.
Summer brings joy, lightheartedness and that is why I decided to write about topics "heavy" as they are defined. Certainly death is not an argument "light" but it exists, and there is daily. It is often paired with suffering. Sooner or later in life we \u200b\u200ball have to do with you On the other hand there is also a saying that says "Sure as death," right because death is a certainty. I do not want to be emo, I want to try to cause you to reflect on mind "hot" not cold, it may be described best with the blood pulsing in his veins than blood with ice cream. Over the years we have followed several cases involving the death, or rather the sweet death. Welby and Eluana as the last. Certain other cases. I do not want to mention two specific cases, I think we all know them pretty well, all we had a review, led us to think, we have (inexplicably) divided. Some have worn the uniform of a good Christian, arming of Truth, leaving aside the feelings of empathy for another human being in pain. Can a Truth and thought about death? Can someone arreccarsi the right to impose suffering only does not commit sin? Unnecessary animal suffering if they are unnecessary ... because we want to impose the man instead? We should reflect on our skin, can be frightening when we should ask ourselves what we want for ourselves. We should keep our guard high on these topics. We know what the situation in Italy? We refresh your memory.
Euthanasia
In Italy, at present, active euthanasia is comparable, in general, voluntary homicide (ex art. 575 Criminal Code). If consent of the patient, is referred to in Article. 579 Criminal Code, entitled as the murder of consent, punishable by imprisonment from 6 to 15 years. The suicide witnessed a crime, under Article. 580 Criminal Code, "Incitement or assisted suicide."
passive euthanasia is allowed in the hospital, in intensive care, only in cases of brain death: should, however, be interviewed relatives of the person and requires the presence and the written permission of the primary, the attending physician and a coroner. In the event of discordant opinion between doctors and family, you go to court and in this case the court shall decide.
Still living will does not exist on a standard living will. On 9 February 2009, the day she died Eluana, the Senate were debating the Bill n.1369 (Decree Calabrò) that would regulate the matter. The text was not widely shared, in particular was strong opposition to Article 3 of the bill. With this article was necessary for all doctors, even against the wishes of patients who had explained a different choice, the mandatory nature of artificial nutrition and hydration. The doctors would have been forced to choose between complying with the code of ethics (which requires them to respect the wishes of the patient), or the law. Furthermore, this article would cause subsequent litigation between families and health.
Dispute, controversy and heated debates, which occurred suddenly were dampened by news of the death of Eluana, by rethinking the group of parliamentary majority to do. So they opted for the withdrawal of the bill. Then a long silence lasted about a year.
Meanwhile, the Catholic Church reported that advocates a law as long as weakened, that is devoid of any recognition of the right to self-determination. Qesto with directions, in the end, the so-called "Bill Calabria", which already reflect the guidelines of the CEI, the agreement was found. Approved by the rapidly before the Senate Committee on Health, then the Senate itself, with 150 votes in favor, 123 against and 3 abstentions, passed before the Committee on Social Affairs and the House, May 12, 2010, was approved without substantial changes. The bill is now waiting to be discussed by the Assembly of Deputies.
To overcome this legal gap, many organizations have developed their own model of the living will. The National Council of Notaries has started a registry at their own expense for the conservation of biological tests and has instructed the District Councils to draw up lists of notaries are available to receive them. Compared to do-it-yourself forms, wills biological signed before a notary has the added value of the certainty of certified origin. Every citizen can therefore call on the Council of Notaries of their city to know what are notaries available and pick one.
Later, several municipalities have agreed to establish similar registries. These approvals are almost always resulted in petitions signed by citizens: the territorial circles UAAR (Union of Rationalist Atheists and Agnostics) have often promoted and helped gather signatures.
0 comments:
Post a Comment