Dear Marco Travaglio,
I am a supporter of your first hour, when still a boy on TV I eventually found a happy chat with Daniele Luttazzi and a guest reporter. Still I admire your ability to pull out of the trial papers ironically tells the uncomfortable truth that no one, not looking at anyone. For some time I look at the 
n more detached manner than usual themes of your work and I am becoming increasingly apparent willingness to focus on the Democratic Party. Most times you are quite right, but I'm beginning to think that in part has become a real editorial line, as we know, sells a lot. Today I jumped in the eyes of the article "Made Daily" shouting all'inciucio for the vote by the PD of the law "save-effects" of the decree "safe-lists" rejected the day before in Parliament. Now let me explain. In the pre-election tussle, the PDL to save himself from irregularities committed during the presentation of lists, has tried to change the tables with the decree "safe-lists", which entered into force immediately but with the necessity of ' Final approval of the Parliament within 30 days thereafter. Yesterday has passed an amendment to the PD that rejected the "safe-lists", without creating in fact a dangerous precedent. Today the same PD has proposed a law "save-effects" mentioned decree, as required by the Constitution, allows us to consider valid the election, despite being held during the period in which the decree was in effect then decayed. So I wonder: where is the mess?
I invite you to read the explanation of vote Mr. Bressa about the saving effects
n more detached manner than usual themes of your work and I am becoming increasingly apparent willingness to focus on the Democratic Party. Most times you are quite right, but I'm beginning to think that in part has become a real editorial line, as we know, sells a lot. Today I jumped in the eyes of the article "Made Daily" shouting all'inciucio for the vote by the PD of the law "save-effects" of the decree "safe-lists" rejected the day before in Parliament. Now let me explain. In the pre-election tussle, the PDL to save himself from irregularities committed during the presentation of lists, has tried to change the tables with the decree "safe-lists", which entered into force immediately but with the necessity of ' Final approval of the Parliament within 30 days thereafter. Yesterday has passed an amendment to the PD that rejected the "safe-lists", without creating in fact a dangerous precedent. Today the same PD has proposed a law "save-effects" mentioned decree, as required by the Constitution, allows us to consider valid the election, despite being held during the period in which the decree was in effect then decayed. So I wonder: where is the mess? I invite you to read the explanation of vote Mr. Bressa about the saving effects
0 comments:
Post a Comment